Не могутъ же они

…Зыбинъ лежалъ и думалъ. То, о чемъ говорилъ Буддо, было совершенно невозможно. Бить тутъ не могли, какъ не могли, напримѣръ, ѣсть человѣческое мясо. Органъ высшаго правосудія, офиціальная государственная инстанція, гдѣ еще жилъ, обиталъ духъ рыцаря…

Read more of Не могутъ же они

Timothy Melley (& Slavoj Žižek): I know very well… but just the same…

A good starting point for such an approach is Slavoj Žižek’s brilliant reconceptualization of ideology as a matter of action rather than knowledge. For Žižek, the sign of an effective ideology is not “false consciousness”…

Read more of Timothy Melley (& Slavoj Žižek): I know very well… but just the same…

Wouter Hanegraaff on the victory of science

[W]e enter a period in which Christianity slowly but surely loses its hegemonic position in intellectual discourse, while academic historians of philosophy abandon the currents and ideas associated with “Platonic Orientalism” as unworthy of serious…

Read more of Wouter Hanegraaff on the victory of science

Wouter Hanegraaff on religionism & eclectism

Due to their utter incompatibility with the findings of modern historical criticism, these two traditional perspectives [apologetic and anti-apologetic currents] were unable to keep up with scholarly progress in the study of ancient religions, and…

Read more of Wouter Hanegraaff on religionism & eclectism

Wouter Hanegraaff on the Enlightment paradigm as the beginning of the eclipse of ‘Western esotericism’

The “Enlightenment paradigm” announced so clearly in [Christoph August] Heumann’s Acta Philosophorum was the beginning of the eclipse of “Western esotericism” in modern intellectual discourse. So far, the “pagan” philosophies associated with Platonic Orientalism had…

Read more of Wouter Hanegraaff on the Enlightment paradigm as the beginning of the eclipse of ‘Western esotericism’

Wouter Hanegraaff on Jacob Thomasius & Ehregott Daniel Colberg

As already noted, [Jacob] Thomasius was not just a critical historian of philosophy. First and foremost, he was a pious Lutheran who believed that the biblical revelation was the only reliable source of religious truth…

Read more of Wouter Hanegraaff on Jacob Thomasius & Ehregott Daniel Colberg

Wouter Hanegraaff on the anti-apologetic foundations of the history of philosophy as a modern discipline

Like Savonarola, Gianfrancesco [Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola’s nephew & follower of Savonarola] points to sacred scripture as the sole, exclusive and absolutely infallible source of true knowledge: the certainty given by absolute…

Read more of Wouter Hanegraaff on the anti-apologetic foundations of the history of philosophy as a modern discipline

Wouter Hanegraaff on George of Trebizond as a conspiracy theorist

One of the major humanists of quattrocento Italy, George [of Trebizond] was also a paranoid fanatic who believed in a conspiracy of platonists preparing the coming of the Antichrist. His Comparatio philosophorum Platonis et Aristotelis,…

Read more of Wouter Hanegraaff on George of Trebizond as a conspiracy theorist